October 22, 2008

Epidexipteryx hui

9:33 pm
  • Epidexipteryx hui
    Credit: Zhao Chuang & Xing Lida.
  • New Dinosaur: Epidexipteryx hui
  • Name Means: Yaoming Hu’s Display Feather
  • Relations: Scansoripterygid Avialaean
  • Holotype: IVPP V15471, skeleton preserved with feather impressions.
  • Location: Inner Mongolia, northern China
  • Age: ?Middle to Late Jurassic, somewhere between 152,000,000 to 168,000,000 years ago
  • Info: The well-preserved skeleton of little Epidexipteryx shows that this pigeon-sized dinosaur was covered in a fluffy feather coat, although it did not possess any contour feathers that would have enabled it to fly. It did, however sport two pairs of long ribbon-like plumes that fanned out from the tip of its rather short tail, presumably used for some sort of display. Other interesting features include its enlarged, forward-curving front teeth and its unusually proportioned hip bones. Its describers suggest that Epidexipteryx was related to the long-fingered Epidendrosaurus, and that these unusual little dinosaurs are examples of a previously unknown diversity of theropods near the origin of birds.
  • Reference: F. Zhang, Z. Zhou, X. Xu, X. Wang and C. Sullivan, 2008. A bizarre Jurassic maniraptoran from China with elongate ribbon-like feathers Nature 455: 1105-1108.
  • Elsewhere on the Web:

—Matt Celeskey.

December 11, 2007

Glacialsaurus hammeri

7:00 pm

Glacialsaurus by William Stout
Glacialsaurus restoration from Science Centric
© 2007 William Stout

New Dinosaur: Glacialsaurus hammeri
Name means: Hammer’s Frozen lizard

Relations: Basal sauropodomorph (prosauropod) dinosaur
Location: Beardmore Glacier region, Antarctica
Age: Early Jurassic, 190,000,000 years ago

Material: Partial right foot and ankle, partial left femur
Est. Length: 8 meters (25 ft) long
Est. Weight: 5 tons

Glacialsaurus hammeri is only the second dinosaur described from the Jurassic of Antarctica, the first being the pompadour-crested theropod Cryolophosaurus ellioti. Although fragmentary, the remains of Glacialsaurus identify it as a prosauropod, one of several types of early long-necked dinosaurs that split off from the sauropodomorph line before true sauropods like Apatosaurus and Camarasaurus evolved. Other fossils found in the same rock formation as Glacialsaurus may come from a true sauropod, suggesting that prosauropods survived alongside their more advanced relatives for a time in the Early Jurassic.

Technical article: Smith, N. D. and Pol, D. 2007. Anatomy of a basal sauropodomorph dinosaur from the Early Jurassic Hanson Formation of Antarctica. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 52 (4): 657–674. PDF.

Elsewhere on the web:

—Matt Celeskey.

August 17, 2007

Jurassic Sea Spiders

7:56 am

BBC News was the first to report on three new species of sea spider from the Jurassic-aged fossil beds at La Voulte-sur-Rhône in southern France. Be sure to flip through this slideshow of the specimens: guaranteed to be the most beautifully creepy fossils you’ll see all day.

Further Reading:

Charbonnier, S., Vannier, J., and Riou, B. New sea spiders from the Jurassic La Voulte-sur-Rhône Lagerstätte. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Published online. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0848

A hi-res image of three of the fossils is available here.

National Geographic News has the story, as does Afarensis.

—Matt Celeskey.

January 28, 2007

The Sinking of Seismosaurus

6:12 pm

Photomontage of the NMMNHS Seismosaurus mount
Photo-montage of the reconstructed Seismosaurus
in the Age of Super Giants hall at the
New Mexico Museum of Natural History & Science.

In 1979, two hikers came across several enormous vertebrae weathering out of Jurassic-aged mudstones near the top of a mesa northwest of Albuquerque, New Mexico. They reported their find, which was on federal land, to the local office of the Bureau of Land Management. BLM paleontologists identified the bones as coming from a large sauropod dinosaur, but lacked the resources to begin a proper excavation of the site. The bones were buried to protect them from further erosion (or unauthorized excavation) until 1985, when the New Mexico Museum of Natural History was about to open in Albuquerque.

A friend of one of the fossil’s disoverers reported the find to Dr. David Gillette, then Curator of Paleontology at the fledgling NMMNH. After a trip to the site, Gillette began making the necessary arrangments to excavate the bones that had been discovered and, eventually, a much greater amount of fossil material that was buried within the mesa. Over the next decade, several tons of rock and bone were chipped from the site and transported to the NMMNH. There, staff and volunteer preparators began the arduous process of separating the fossils from the surrounding rock (matrix)—a process complicated by the fact that both fossil and matrix were similar in color, hardness, and in some areas, texture.

After some of the first bones (vertebrae from the middle of the tail) were prepared, Gillette began comparing them to their counterparts in other sauropods. Although they were closest in form to the well-known Diplodocus, they were much larger and differed in their overall proportions. Gillette concluded that they were unique enough to warrant their own genus, and in 1991 he published an article naming the fossil Seismosaurus halli, or “Hall’s Earth-shaking Lizard.” (Because the name was intended to honor both Reverend James Hall and his wife, Ruth, for their contributions to New Mexico paleontology, it was later emended to the plural possessive form Seismosaurus hallorum.) In his description, Gillette estimated that, when alive, Seismosaurus might have been up to 52 meters (170 feet) long.

By the closing years of the 20th century, enough of the fossils had been prepared to begin the creation of an accurate skeletal reconstruction of Seismosaurus. As new teams of researchers began to compare Seismosaurus to Diplodocus, they began to suspect that some of the bones that Gillette had placed towards the middle of the tail had, in fact, been located much closer to the hips. This realization significantly shortened the animal’s overall length, from a near-record 170-foot maximum down to a “mere” 110 feet long.

More importantly, this revised interpretation eliminated several of the anatomical characters that Dr. Gillette had used to distinguish Seismosaurus from Diplodocus. Most of the characters that remained had to do with relative proportions of the vertebrae, and several researchers suggested that these were well within the range of variation one might expect in a dinosaur genus like Diplodocus.

Diagram comparing Gillette's 1991 interpretation of the Seismosaurus bones to that of Lucas et al. 2006
Lucas et al. 2006 Figure 2: A diagram I worked up showing the differing interpretations
of bone location in the Seismosaurus holotype.

By 2004, when a reconstructed skeleton was put on display in the New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science (the institution’s name has lengthened with age), only one feature remained that was clearly unique to Seismosaurus—an unusual prong at the tip of its ischium (the backward-pointing bone in its hip). But when this bone was prepared more thoroughly, it became apparent that the ‘prong’ was actually a piece from one of the vertebrae that had broken off post-mortem and drifted beneath the animal, coming to rest at the tip of the ischium. Eventually the two bones were cemented together by the nearly indistinguishable matrix.

A new paper in the NMMNHS Bulletin discusses the features unique to Seismosaurus, shows the before-and-after ischium, and, with this last notable character gone, sinks the earth-shaking Seismosaurus into the long-established genus Diplodocus. It is kept as a separate, over-sized species—Diplodocus hallorum—based on its relative proportions and the paddle-like shape of some of the chevron bones in its tail. However, the authors note that the other four named species of Diplodocus are in need of re-examination, and there is no guarantee that the dinosaur formerly known as Seismosaurus would retain even a specific level of distinction in the light of current taxonomic thought.

Further Reading:

Gillette, D. D. 1991. Seismosaurus halli, gen. et sp. nov., a new sauropod dinosaur from the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic/Lower Cretaceous) of New Mexico, USA. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 11, pp. 417–433.

Gillette, D. D. 1994. Seismosaurus: The Earth Shaker. New York, Columbia University Press. HTML.

Herne, M. C. and Lucas, S. G. 2006. Seismosaurus hallorum: Osteological reconstruction from the holotype. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 36. pp. 139–148.

Lucas, S. G., Spielmann, J. A., Rinehart, L. F., Heckert, A. B., Herne, M. C., Hunt, A. P., Foster, J. R., and Sullivan, R. M. 2006. Taxonomic status of Seismosaurus hallorum, a Late Jurassic sauropod dinosaur from New Mexico. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 36. pp. 149–161.

—Matt Celeskey.

January 13, 2007

Resizing Amphicoelias

11:43 pm

Last summer, a comment about the size of the newly-described South American sauropod Puertasaurus led me to investigate the size of Amphicoelias fragillimus, the name E. D. Cope gave to part of one gigantic sauropod vertebra found in Colorado in the 1870s. In a comment to that post, Jerry Harris dropped the hint that more information on A. fragillimus was in the works, and now at least part of what he alluded to has come to pass. A new paper by Ken Carpenter of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science reviews what is known of A. fragillimus, provides a revised size estimate, and discusses why so many sauropods got so darned big.

This paper has inspired a couple of very good posts on Darren Naish’s Tetrapod Zoology blog, and I’ll refer the reader here and here for his excellent summary of the history and validity of A. fragillimus. I’ll focus on the new size estimates, and why A. fragillimus was even larger than I had imagined.

My initial estimate of the size of A. fragillimus was made by comparing Cope’s reconstruction of the type vertebra to the vertebrae of local giant Seismosaurus hallorum (properly Diplodocus hallorum at this point, but more on that later). Scaling up a Seismosaurus to fit Cope’s estimate of a 6 to 7 foot tall A. fragillimus vertebrae results in an animal about 50 meters (160 feet) long.

As it turns out, Cope may have significantly underestimated the height of the vertebra of A. fragillimus. Carpenter compared Cope’s drawing of the Amphicoelias fragillimus specimen with material known from another, more reasonably-sized species of Amphicoelias, A. altus. Scaling an A. altus dorsal to fit the A. fragillimus material results in a whopping 2.7 meter (8.8 foot) tall bone!

Mega-sauropod vertebrae

From left to right:

  • The diplodocid Seismosaurus hallorum dorsal 8 (after Herne and Lucas 2006),
  • The diplodocid Amphicoelias fragillimus dorsal 9/10? as reconstructed by Cope 1878,
  • The diplodocid Amphicoelias fragillimus dorsal 9/10? as reconstructed by Carpenter 2006, scaled from
  • The diplodocid Amphicoelias altus dorsal 10? (after Carpenter 2006, modified from Osborn and Mook 1921),
  • The titanosaur Puertasaurus reuili dorsal 2 after Novas et al 2005, Figure 2). Scale bar equals 1 meter.

Carpenter scaled up a Diplodocus to fit this new super-sized vertebra, and his Amphicoelias fragillimus measures a full 58 meters (190 feet) from snout to tail. The estimated mass of this mega-sauropod would be about 122,400 kg (about 270,00 lbs or 135 tons).

Here is the size comparison I made last summer, comparing the big diplodocids Seismosaurus hallorum (33 meters) and Amphicoelias fragillimus (my 50-meter estimate) to some of the largest titanosaurs, Argentinosaurus huinculensis (at 37.5 meters, the length of the skeletal reconstruction on display at the Fernbank Museum) and Puertasaurus reuili (at 40 meters, the upper estimate reported in the media). Click on the image for a larger version:

Mega-sauropod sizes, August 2006

In Figure 3 of his paper, Carpenter shows a more detailed size comparison of mega- and super-sauropods (mega-sauropods are defined as those that reach or exceed 30 meters in length)—a copy of it is posted here. In addition to an enormous Amphicoelias, it shows Seismosaurus (C) and a silhouette of Argentinosaurus (F) based on the profile of the related titanosaur Saltasaurus. This new titanosaur shape changes their dimensions considerably, shrinking Argentinosaurus from 37.5 down to 30 meters in length.

Based on this information, I resized and revised and came up with the following size comparison (click for a larger version):

Mega-sauropod sizes, January 2007

From left to right:

  • The diplodocid Seismosaurus hallorum (skeleton on display at the NMMNHS–33 m. (110 ft.) long),
  • The diplodocid Amphicoelias fragillimus (est 58 m. (190 ft.) long),
  • Homo sapiens (1.8 m. (6 ft.) tall),
  • African Elephant Loxodonta africana (4 m. (13 ft.) tall at the shoulder),
  • The titanosaur Argentinosaurus huinculensis (est 30 m. (98 ft.) long),
  • The titanosaur Puertasaurus reuili (shortest reported estimate 35 m. (115 ft.) long).

Note that, in this latest estimate, Seismosaurus completely fits under the tail of Amphicoelias fragillimus!

Further Reading:

Carpenter, K. 2006. Biggest of the big: a critical re-evaluation of the mega-sauropod Amphicoelias fragillimus Cope, 1878. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 36: pp. 131–137. PDF.

Cope, E. D. 1878. A new species of Amphicoelias. American Naturalist 12(8): pp. 563–564. JPG. HTML.

Herne, M. C. and Lucas, S. G. 2006. Seismosaurus hallorum: osteological reconstruction from the holotype. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 36: pp. 139–148.

Novas, F. E., Salgado, L., Calvo, J., and Agnolin, F. 2005. Giant titanosaur (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia. Rev. Mus. Argentino Cienc. Nat., 7(1): pp. 37–41. PDF.

Don’t forget the two posts at Tetrapod Zoology, and Matt Wedel (a.k.a. Doctor Vector) promises to weigh in on the topic, so you know that’s worth keeping an eye out for.

—Matt Celeskey.