<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mapusaurus, bigger than T. rex?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hmnh.org/archives/2006/04/18/mapusaurus-bigger-than-t-rex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hmnh.org/archives/2006/04/18/mapusaurus-bigger-than-t-rex/</link>
	<description>The institutionalized doodles and discoveries of a dead-animal designer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:55:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Celeskey</title>
		<link>http://www.hmnh.org/archives/2006/04/18/mapusaurus-bigger-than-t-rex/comment-page-1/#comment-11171</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Celeskey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmnh.org/archives/2006/04/18/mapusaurus-bigger-than-t-rex/#comment-11171</guid>
		<description>Hi Roger -

Who needs an in-depth site when you can go direct to the source? The paper describing &lt;i&gt;Mapusaurus&lt;/i&gt; is still freely available &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/7653_g06n1a4.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. I haven&#039;t heard of any further papers written about this animal, so the sum total of published scientific knowledge about &lt;i&gt;Mapusaurus&lt;/i&gt; is available at your fingertips!

Not too shabby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roger -</p>
<p>Who needs an in-depth site when you can go direct to the source? The paper describing <i>Mapusaurus</i> is still freely available <a href="http://www.mnhn.fr/museum/front/medias/publication/7653_g06n1a4.pdf" rel="nofollow">here</a>. I haven&#8217;t heard of any further papers written about this animal, so the sum total of published scientific knowledge about <i>Mapusaurus</i> is available at your fingertips!</p>
<p>Not too shabby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.hmnh.org/archives/2006/04/18/mapusaurus-bigger-than-t-rex/comment-page-1/#comment-11170</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 07:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmnh.org/archives/2006/04/18/mapusaurus-bigger-than-t-rex/#comment-11170</guid>
		<description>I have spent the last half hour or more visiting site after site, mostly science pages and some news pages trying to find a single datum on this  Mapusaurus skull.  Beyond the blurbs about it being guessed it was about 41 feet long, no indications of the length, width or height of the skull. No photos of the original skull on site, that is, where it was discovered, no useful information of relative size, such as a yard-stick or a man with a yard stick standing next to it....a dog, really helpful.  Just blurbs and speculations, some data about the teeth being like &quot;knives&quot; but no close up of the teeth.  I mean, I would have expected to find some real meat to this story.  I guess we&#039;ll have to wait for the &quot;history&quot; channel or some National Geographic special.  What a disappointment. The internet is really dilute.  Can you point us to an in depth site on this animal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have spent the last half hour or more visiting site after site, mostly science pages and some news pages trying to find a single datum on this  Mapusaurus skull.  Beyond the blurbs about it being guessed it was about 41 feet long, no indications of the length, width or height of the skull. No photos of the original skull on site, that is, where it was discovered, no useful information of relative size, such as a yard-stick or a man with a yard stick standing next to it&#8230;.a dog, really helpful.  Just blurbs and speculations, some data about the teeth being like &#8220;knives&#8221; but no close up of the teeth.  I mean, I would have expected to find some real meat to this story.  I guess we&#8217;ll have to wait for the &#8220;history&#8221; channel or some National Geographic special.  What a disappointment. The internet is really dilute.  Can you point us to an in depth site on this animal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

